Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the vapinger.com chance of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we have to do to solve the issue of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.